Amnesty International
'''Amnesty International''' (or AI) is an international non-governmental organization that works to promote all the human rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international standards. In particular, Amnesty International campaigns to free all prisoners of conscience; ensure fair and prompt trials for political prisoners; abolish the death penalty, torture, and other cruel treatment of prisoners; end political killings and forced disappearances; and oppose all human rights abuses, whether by governments or by opposition groups. Image:Amnesty_Logo.gif
History
Amnesty International was founded in 1961 by a British lawyer named Peter Benenson. Benenson was reading his newspaper and was shocked and angered to come across the story of two Portuguese students sentenced to seven years in prison – for the crime of raising their glasses in a toast to freedom. Benenson wrote to David Astor, editor of The Observer newspaper, who, on May 28, published Benenson's article entitled The Forgotten Prisoners that asked readers to write letters showing support for the students. The response was so overwhelming that within a year groups of letter writers had formed in more than a dozen countries, writing to defend victims of injustice wherever they might be. By mid-1962, Amnesty had groups working or forming in West Germany, Belgium, Switzerland, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Ireland, Canada, Ceylon, Greece, Australia, the United States, New Zealand, Ghana, Israel, Mexico, Argentina, Jamaica, Malaya, Congo (Brazzaville), Ethiopia, Nigeria, Burma, and India. Later in that year, a member of one of these groups, Diana Redhouse, designed Amnesty's Candle and Barbed-Wire logo. In its early years, Amnesty focused only on articles 18 and 19 of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights – those dealing with political prisoners. Over time, however, the organisation has expanded its mission to work for victims of some other categories of human rights violations, not just prisoners of conscience. In 2000 alone, AI worked on behalf of 3,685 named individuals – and in over a third of those cases, an improvement in the prisoner's condition occurred. Today, there are upwards of 7,500 AI groups with around a million members operating in 162 countries and territories. Since AI was founded, it has worked to defend more than 44,600 prisoners in hundreds of countries. In 1977 Amnesty won the Nobel Peace Prize for its work defending human rights around the world.Goals and strategy
AI aims to maintain every human's basic rights as established under the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights. In accordance with this belief, Amnesty works to:- Free all Prisoners of Conscience (a "POC" is a person imprisoned for the peaceful exercise of their beliefs, which differs somewhat from the typical use of the term political prisoner).
- Ensure fair and prompt trials.
- Abolish all forms of torture and ill-treatment of prisoners, including the use of the death penalty.
- End state-sanctioned terrorism, killings, and disappearances.
- Assist political asylum-seekers.
- Co-operate with organizations such as the United Nations who also seek to put an end to human rights abuses.
- Raise awareness about human rights abuses around the world.
Finances
Amnesty International is financed largely by subscriptions and donations from its worldwide membership, and except for a small core of paid directors, all of Amnesty's members, coordinators, organizers, and workers are volunteers. Amnesty is a non-partisan organization and does not accept money donations from governments or governmental organizations. All of Amnesty's capital comes from the pockets of its members and donations from other non-partisan organizations. Amnesty's budget for the 2000 fiscal year was as follows: [[Irene Khan, Secretary General since August 2001]]- Membership Support: £2,486,700 (13%)
- Campaigning Activities: £1,811,200 (10%)
- Publications and Translation: £2,487,200 (13%)
- Research and Action: £5,065,100 (26%)
- Deconcentrated Offices: £1,246,300 (7%)
- Research and Action Support: £2,615,900 (14%)
- Administrative Costs: £3,247,200 (17%)
- Relief Payments: £125,000
- Total: £19,510,000
Organisation
The fact that Amnesty is composed of small autonomous groups loosely joined together by larger governing bodies makes explaining the structure of Amnesty's bureaucracy complex. On a national level, the membership directly elects (each group gets a vote; and each individual member gets a vote, regardless of age) prominent members to the 18-seat Board of Directors for a three-year term. The Board of Directors hires an Executive Director and a staff. On a world-wide level, Amnesty is governed by the International Executive Council (IEC) – a board of eight members elected for two-year terms by the International Council Meeting, which is composed of delegates from each country's Board of Directors. The IEC then hires a Secretary General and an International Secretariat. Amnesty members end each Annual General Meeting with a commemorative toast to freedom.Criticism
Criticism of Amnesty International may be classified into two major categories, accusations of selection bias and ideological bias. Some critics have noted that in nations that have relatively open and free societies, in which political opposition and freedom of speech are comparatively protected, AI has greater opportunity to compile and report on allegations of human rights abuse. In nations where international human rights monitors are completely banned, for example, or in which the press and individual speech critical of the government are nonexistent or heavily censored, it is relatively difficult for AI to report on the same. This potential tendency to over-report allegations of human rights abuse in nations that are comparatively lessor violators of human rights has been called "Moynihan's Law," after the late American Senator and former Ambassador to the United Nations Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who is said to have stated that at the United Nations, the number of complaints about a nation's violation of human rights is inversely proportional to their actual violation of human rights. Critics who allege AI suffers from this problem point out what they describe as a disproportionate focus on allegations of human rights violations in for example Israel, when compared with North Korea or Cambodia. One such example is the allegation of NGO Monitor, a publication of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, which noted that between 2001 and 2004 AI issued 52 reports on the human rights abuses in the Sudan, which has claimed tens of thousands of lives through starvation and ethnic violence, as well as creating 1.2 million refugees (according to the World Health Organization), while AI concurrently issued 192 reports on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.http://www.ngo-monitor.org/editions/v2n10/v2n10-4.htm Conservative commentators in various publications have alleged that AI's reporting reflects ideological bias toward a liberal political viewpoint in opposition to the foreign policy of the United States. To support this they point to AI's treatment of the human rights implications of the U.S.-led war in Iraq. Critics of AI have suggested that AI's concern for the human rights implications of this war disproportionately criticize the effects of U.S. military action while in comparison they were less vociferous about the abuses of the Hussein regime and the human rights implications of the continued rule of this government. Examples of this criticism can be found in the links below. Critics have also claimed that Amnesty International has failed to give proper weight to, or take a strong enough stance against:- Alleged Israeli abuses of Palestinian human rights.
- Alleged abuses against human rights in Puerto Rico.
- Apartheid South Africa.
Other critics:
- Prof. Michael Mandel, a professor of international law at York Univ., Toronto.
- Prof. Nabeel Abraham, professor anthropology at Henry Ford Univ., Michigan. He has written a comparative study of ten human rights organizations.
- Prof. Clare Brandabur, professor of Comparative English Literature at Dogus Univ. Turkey.
- Prof. Agustin Velloso, UNED, Dept. Comparative Educational Systems, Madrid Spain.
- Diana Johnstone documents AI's coverage in the case of the former Yugoslavia, alleging bias.
- Paul de Rooij (three articles discussing various aspects of AI's alleged bias).
See also
- The Secret Policeman's Ball
- Human Rights Watch
- International Freedom of Expression Exchange
External links
- Amnesty International's website
- Peter Benenson: The Forgotten Prisoners The Observer, May 28, 1961
- Willam Schulz, Security Is a Human Right, Too, New York Times, April 18, 2004.
Articles Critical of AI
- Jonathan V. Last, Calling It Like They See It, FrontPageMagazine, April 3, 2003. Alleges AI has anti-American/Israel bias.
- Christopher Archangelli, Amnesty for Iraq, FrontPageMagazine, April 24, 2003. Allages AI has anti-American bias regarding Iraq.
- NGO Monitor Criticisms of Amnesty International – Points to a running list of criticism of various NGOs, AI in particular.
- Nabeel Abraham, et al.; International Human Rights Organizations and the Palestine Question, Middle East Report (MERIP), Vol. 18, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1988, pp. 12 – 20. Argues that several organizations, including AI, are biased against Palestinians.
- Nabeel Abraham, Torture, Anyone?, Lies of Our Times, May 1992, pp. 2 – 4. Claims AI and other groups are reticent in describing alleged torture on the part of Israel.
- Dennis Bernstein's interview with Prof. Francis Boyle, CAQ, Summer 2002. Boyle, a former AI-USA board member, threatened to sue AI-USA over its alleged biased coverage.
- Alexander Cockburn, How the US State Dept. Recruited Human Rights Groups to Cheer On the Bombing Raids: Those Incubator Babies, Once More?, CounterPunch newsletter, April 1-15, 1999. Alleges several human rights organizations "fell into line" regarding the bombing of Serbia.
- Michael Mandel, How America Gets Away With Murder: Illegal Wars, Collateral Damage and Crimes Against Humanity, Pluto Press 2004. Alleges AI is selective in defending "human rights", in particular, regarding the US-Iraq war 2003, and the War in the Balkans.
- Paul de Rooij, AI: Say It Isn't So, CounterPunch, Oct. 31, 2002.
- Paul de Rooij, AI: The Case of a Rape Foretold, CounterPunch, Nov. 26, 2003.
- Paul de Rooij, AI: A false beacon?, CounterPunch, Oct. 13, 2004. Contains a reading list.
mnesty International
Anesty International
Amesty International
Amnsty International
Amnety International
Amnesy International
Amnest International
AmnestyInternational
Amnesty nternational
Amnesty Iternational
Amnesty Inernational
Amnesty Intrnational
Amnesty Intenational
Amnesty Interational
Amnesty Interntional
Amnesty Internaional
Amnesty Internatonal
Amnesty Internatinal
Amnesty Internatioal
Amnesty Internationl
Amnesty Internationa
mAnesty International
Anmesty International
Amensty International
Amnsety International
Amnetsy International
Amnesyt International
Amnest yInternational
AmnestyI nternational
Amnesty nIternational
Amnesty Itnernational
Amnesty Inetrnational
Amnesty Intrenational
Amnesty Intenrational
Amnesty Interantional
Amnesty Interntaional
Amnesty Internaitonal
Amnesty Internatoinal
Amnesty Internatinoal
Amnesty Internatioanl
Amnesty Internationla
Amnesty Internationa
AAmnesty International
Ammnesty International
Amnnesty International
Amneesty International
Amnessty International
Amnestty International
Amnestyy International
Amnesty International
Amnesty IInternational
Amnesty Innternational
Amnesty Intternational
Amnesty Inteernational
Amnesty Interrnational
Amnesty Internnational
Amnesty Internaational
Amnesty Internattional
Amnesty Internatiional
Amnesty Internatioonal
Amnesty Internationnal
Amnesty Internationaal
Amnesty Internationall
mnesty international
anesty international
amesty international
amnsty international
amnety international
amnesy international
amnest international
amnestyinternational
amnesty nternational
amnesty iternational
amnesty inernational
amnesty intrnational
amnesty intenational
amnesty interational
amnesty interntional
amnesty internaional
amnesty internatonal
amnesty internatinal
amnesty internatioal
amnesty internationl
amnesty internationa
manesty international
anmesty international
amensty international
amnsety international
amnetsy international
amnesyt international
amnest yinternational
amnestyi nternational
amnesty niternational
amnesty itnernational
amnesty inetrnational
amnesty intrenational
amnesty intenrational
amnesty interantional
amnesty interntaional
amnesty internaitonal
amnesty internatoinal
amnesty internatinoal
amnesty internatioanl
amnesty internationla
amnesty internationa
aamnesty international
ammnesty international
amnnesty international
amneesty international
amnessty international
amnestty international
amnestyy international
amnesty international
amnesty iinternational
amnesty innternational
amnesty intternational
amnesty inteernational
amnesty interrnational
amnesty internnational
amnesty internaational
amnesty internattional
amnesty internatiional
amnesty internatioonal
amnesty internationnal
amnesty internationaal
amnesty internationall